Skip to main content

Development of a Classical Force Field for the Oxidised Si Surface: Application to Hydrophilic Wafer Bonding


Published July 21, 2008
SHOW MORE


We have developed a classical two- and three-body interaction potential to simulate the hydroxylated, natively oxidised Si surface in contact with water solutions, based on the combination and extension of the Stillinger-Weber potential and of a potential originally developed to simulate SiO2 polymorphs. The potential parameters are chosen to reproduce the structure, charge distribution, tensile surface stress and interactions with single water molecules of a natively oxidised Si surface model previously obtained by means of accurate density functional theory simulations. We have applied the potential to the case of hydrophilic silicon wafer bonding at room temperature, revealing maximum room temperature work of adhesion values for natively oxidised and amorphous silica surfaces of 97 mJ/m2 and 90mJ/m2, respectively, at a water adsorption coverage of approximately 1 monolayer. The difference arises from the stronger interaction of the natively oxidised surface with liquid water, resulting in a higher heat of immersion (203 mJ/m2 vs. 166 mJ/m2), and may be explained in terms of the more pronounced water structuring close to the surface in alternating layers of larger and smaller density with respect to the liquid bulk. The computed force-displacement bonding curves may be a useful input for cohesive zone models where both the topographic details of the surfaces and the dependence of the attractive force on the initial surface separation and wetting can be taken into account.


Language English
Collection arxiv; additional_collections

Reviews

There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write a review.
PEOPLE ALSO FOUND
Arxiv.org
by J. E. Prieto; E. Korutcheva; I. Markov
11
0
0
Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0404673v2
Arxiv.org
by E. Lunghi
10
0
0
Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9907329v1
Arxiv.org
by Albrecht Boettcher; Harold Widom
12
0
0
Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0312198v2
Arxiv.org
by Shiro Goto; Satou Kimura; Naoyuki Matsuoka; Tran Thi Phuong
5
0
0
Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.1387v2
Arxiv.org
by P. Balbi; A. Giovannini
7
0
0
Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0212168v1
Arxiv.org
by Gleb Arutyunov; Emery Sokatchev
10
0
0
Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0209103v1
Arxiv.org
by Decio Levi; Christian Scimiterna
5
0
0
Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.0154v1
Arxiv.org
by Raul Jimenez; Benjamin Panter; Alan Heavens; Licia Verde
11
0
0
Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0403294v2
Arxiv.org
by Benjamin K. Tippett; Kayll Lake
9
0
0
Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0409088v1
Arxiv.org
by R. G. Sharp; R. G. McMahon; M. J. Irwin; S. T. Hodgkin
10
0
0
Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0103079v2